News roundup from May 2, 2018 information session for Holyrood Gardens



Here’s the news roundup covering the Holyrood Gardens Information Session on May 2, 2018. The Holyrood Development Committee delivered a flyer to virtually every residence in Holyrood. Thank you to the hundreds of people who came out to share their thoughts.

Do you have things you would like the Holyrood Development Committee to know before this goes to City Council? It’s not too late to add your voice. Share below in the comments section below.

“‘A step backwards:’ Holyrood residents disappointed with developer’s new design”…

“Revised proposal for Holyrood Gardens doesn’t win over neighbours”…/holyrood-gardens-project-edmonton-city-…

“‘It looks like a slum’: Holyrood neighbours disappointed at project’s new design”…/it-looks-like-a-slum-holyrood-…

“Holyrood Gardens revised plan misses mark again, residents say”




New vision Bonnie Doon Mall site is under development

Did you know that there are plans to redevelop the 30 acres of land around Bonnie Doon Mall? Morguard, a real estate company, is planning a major “mixed-use transit oriented development” in this location. The project will be phased in over the next 30 years.

They are reaching out to all communities in the area. Morguard is inviting you to share your vision for the land. You can share your ideas at the Inspiration Centre (just outside of the North entrance to Safeway. The first phase of public engagement, can be done in person at the Inspiration Centre, by email ( or by phone (780-900-8729). For the Internet aficionados, there is also an online survey. For more information visit their website at:

There are five guiding principles for the redevelopment, which aims to create a community that will draw people from around Edmonton. The principles are: Sustainable Development, Healthy Streets, Distinct and Authentic Design, Inclusive Public Spaces and Evolve Bonnie Doon. Examples of what these principles mean can be found in the Inspiration Centre.

Please share your ideas. Everything from urban design, affordable housing, senior housing, amenities, green space and more is open for discussion. Together we can build a vision for this very important community hub.


“Holyrood decision bodes well for future”, Edmonton Journal, Dec. 2, 201

Below is our “letter to the editor” response to the Edmonton Journal article written by David Staples on November 29, 2017. You can also view our response online. Comments are welcome on the Edmonton Journal’s webpage.

On Nov. 27, the Holyrood Development Committee (HDC) and community members stood before city council at a public hearing regarding Regency Developments’ up-zoning proposal for Holyrood Gardens.

At the community’s request, council referred the proposal back to administration to “… return with a proposal that generally meets the large site guidelines for the 35-per-cent plane, the tower floor plate size, and work with the community on potential road closures to mitigate traffic cutting back into the community … .”

Council also started the process to require all future large infill sites and transit oriented developments (TOD) be referred to the Edmonton Design Committee. This landmark decision will see an independent panel of urban design experts provide best practice recommendations for all future high-density TOD projects.

The HDC would like the city to prepare a neighbourhood plan to account for more densification and development in Holyrood. Our community is expected to grow rapidly and this plan will set clear expectations for land-use alternatives.

The community league hopes this inclusive, holistic approach to planning will create spaces that welcome new families and embrace seniors who want to age in place.

We look forward to a robust and meaningful community-engagement process that includes all key stakeholders. With better collaboration, in-depth analysis and discussion, between residents, the city and Regency Developments, the Holyrood Stop will become a great transit-oriented place and a model TOD for Edmonton.

Sherri Shorten, Holyrood Development Committee

Edmonton Journal Article: Highrise developments, city consultation irk residents of Ward 8

Journalist Keith Gerein wrote an article addressing the concerns of Ward 8 with respect to the Holyrood Gardens proposal. Highlights of this article include:

  • Kirsten Goa, Ward 8 candidate, indicating she would like a more robust consultation process that engages residents earlier in the process and features real conversations over surveys.
  • Maureen Duguay, president of the Strathcona Community League asks. “Why does density have to equal highrise?” and that the “…biggest concern has been the consultation process. We get very frustrated going against a big machine that has unlimited resources when we work with the city and developers.”
  • Ben Henderson saying he is irritated at the city’s willingness to blow up its plan.

The article is available here:

Highrise developments, city consultation irk residents of Ward 8, Edmonton Journal, October 6, 2017.

Edmonton Journal – Ward 8 candidate forum: development controversies ignite passions

Last night several members of the HDC attending the Ward 8 candidates forum. When someone asked about what candidates would do to address the power imbalance between developers and city staff on one side, and citizens on the other side, the audience broke into applause.

The Edmonton Journal published the following article late October 2, 2017: Ward 8 candidate forum: development controversies ignite passions. 

We encourage all residents of neighbourhoods to raise this issue with candidates at all forums over the coming weeks. Please visit the City of Edmonton’s website to learn about the time, date and location of many forums.

Regency Developments’ proposal fails citizens in three ways

Regency Developments’ proposal for Holyrood Gardens is failing citizens in three ways: policy, planning, and process.


  • COE Guidelines. Regency Developments’ proposal does not meet the City of Edmonton’s Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Guidelines or Infill Guidelines for Large Sites. The towers are too tall for the site (22 and 18 storeys). Guidelines suggest housing should be low to mid-rise apartments NOT high-rises.  
  • Urban form/City strategy. Insufficient details are provided demonstrating the development is a quality, sustainable design that fits with its surroundings. The developer refused to share information with the Edmonton Design Committee, a panel of independent design experts that are helping bring the City’s vision to life.
  • Floor plate. The floor plate of the towers is 25-60% bigger than established norms.
  • Site Vision & Community Context Plan. No neighbourhood plan was created with the community to guide or assess the developer’s proposal.  


  • Planning. Underground parkades, retail shops, LRT Station, and 85 Street crosswalks are all located within the same half-block on 93 Ave.
  • Traffic. Traffic impact assessment did not evaluate the impacts of the Valley LRT line and its predicted traffic congestion. No assessment of traffic impacts during peak school times were completed.
  • Safety. No pedestrian counts were done at the school during busy times of day.  
  • Population and Demographics. 1200 units could double neighbourhood population in 10 years.
  • The proposal will not replace the family-friendly housing of Holyrood Gardens. Only 36 family-friendly units (3 bedrooms) will be built. Of the remaining units, 204 will have 1 bedroom and 960 units will be 2-bedroom and 2-bath units. Units will be priced $450-500k with additional condo fees.
  • Loss of Holyrood Gardens residents will affect the Holyrood school; of the 50 English language program students, 30 live in Holyrood Gardens. Losing these students could mean the loss of the English language program.


  • Developer. The developer is failing citizens by:
  • Ignoring community requests to lower building heights; instead they propose taller buildings.
  • Inadequate community compensation compared to other communities.
  • Not informing Holyrood Gardens tenants about their activities or future impacts.
  • City of Edmonton. City Administration is failing citizens by:
        • Lack of details. The community has not been able to provide valuable feedback that could be included in the design.
        • Sidestepping TOD guidelines and infill controls. Why is Planning not guiding developers to follow the city’s current guidelines and policies?
        • Ineffective public engagement process, with fast-tracked timeline and limited community collaboration.